[ECOS] Re: updated AT91/EB40 hal

[Christophe Part]

Hi Thomas,

I have tried your epk files on the snapshot ecos-v2-full-alpha-snap-2002-10-14 
from the ecoscentric web site. 

[chpart@cortomaltese packages]$ tclsh ecosadmin.tcl add 
../epk/flash_at49xxxx.epk
adding package CYGPKG_DEVS_FLASH_ATMEL_AT49XX1604A
[chpart@cortomaltese packages]$ tclsh ecosadmin.tcl add ../epk/hal_at91.epk
adding package CYGPKG_HAL_ARM_AT91
[chpart@cortomaltese packages]$ tclsh ecosadmin.tcl add ../epk/hal_eb40.epk
adding package CYGPKG_HAL_ARM_AT91_EB40
adding target eb40

then I have applied the patch file :

[chpart@cortomaltese ecos]$ patch -p0 < epk/ThomasKeller.patchpourepk
patching file packages/devs/flash/arm/at91/current/ChangeLog
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
patching file packages/devs/flash/arm/at91/current/src/at91_flash.c
patching file packages/devs/flash/arm/at91/current/src/flash.h
patching file packages/devs/flash/arm/at91/current/src/flash_erase_block.c
patching file packages/devs/flash/arm/at91/current/src/flash_program_buf.c
patching file packages/devs/flash/arm/at91/current/src/flash_query.c
patching file packages/io/flash/current/ChangeLog
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
patching file packages/io/flash/current/include/flash.h
patching file packages/io/flash/current/src/flash.c
patching file packages/redboot/current/ChangeLog
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
patching file packages/redboot/current/src/flash.c
Hunk #11 FAILED at 1241.
1 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
packages/redboot/current/src/flash.c.rej

I have attached flash.c.rej , flash.c.orig and my flash.c.
Could you look at my correction ? The rej file surprise me.

Now, when I start configtool, I have this error.

ecos.db, package CYGPKG_HAL_ARM_AT91: warning
    Version subdirectory `var' does not have a CDL script `hal_arm_at91.cdl'.
ecos.db, package CYGPKG_HAL_ARM_AT91: warning
    Version subdirectory `eb40' does not have a CDL script `hal_arm_at91.cdl'.


If I understand well I have now to patch the directory eb40 to create the 
directory eb40A with the patch of Tim but without the patch for the flash.
Is it true ?

In the var_io.h file, do i have to correct the register ?

#define AT91_PS         0xFFFF4000
#define AT91_PS_CR        0x000    // Control
#define AT91_PS_PCER      0x004    // Peripheral clock enable
#define AT91_PS_PCDR      0x004    // Peripheral clock disable
#define AT91_PS_PCSR      0x004    // Peripheral clock status

by 
#define AT91_PS         0xFFFF4000
#define AT91_PS_CR        0x000    // Control
#define AT91_PS_PCER      0x004    // Peripheral clock enable
#define AT91_PS_PCDR      0x008    // Peripheral clock disable
#define AT91_PS_PCSR      0x00C    // Peripheral clock status

From Marc Pignat.


Thanks for your help,

Christophe


On Sunday 20 October 2002 08:19 am, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> There has been some discussion about the modular AT91/EB40 hal
> recently. I'd like to point those using it to an updated version that I
> uploaded to ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com about a week ago,
> and for which I submitted a copyright assignment to Red Hat:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-patches/2002-10/msg00008.html
>
> So this will be the version that will (hopefully) be included into CVS and
> I'd like to encourage everyone using one of the older versions to have a
> look at it.
>
> tk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: flash.tar.bz2
Type: application/x-tbz
Size: 17785 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/ecos-discuss/attachments/20021020/50eb10ac/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss