[ECOS] EB40/AT91 and EB40A Patches

[Tim Drury]

Take a look at this thread from back in June:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-06/msg00496.html

I made the mistake of not erasing the at91 tree before applying
Thomas' patch - it's not really a patch per-se just a new at91
tree.

If you look at the email list archives from late May through
June and look for emails from me (Tim Drury) and Thomas Koeller,
you find a lot of info.  I was probably one of the first people
to use Thomas'patch so I probably screwed up more than anyone
else.

-tim



Greg Holdren wrote:

> Tim,
>
> I have installed the tar files and both Thomas's and your ecos.db patch
> files.
> Your at91_patch fie is quite large so Im trying to let patch do this 
> one. In
> any
> case I seem to be missing the file, "var_io.h", in
> "hal/arm/at91/var/current/include", so
> its bombing on this part of it. Could I get yours? Should have at91.tar
> provide this?
>
> TNX
> Greg Holdren
>
>
> >Greg, you will probably only run into this problem when patching ecos.db
> >since that file is constantly getting patched.  Ecos.db is arranged as
> >many small blocks of ~8 lines and it is very easy to merge changes by
> >hand.  It should be a fairly easy exercise to install the patches
> >manually be changing/inserting the new blocks that pertain to the at91,
> >eb40, eb40a, and eb40a flash driver.
> >
> >The bulk of the patches work on the hal/arm/at91 directory structure
> >which, IIRC, Thomas' patch completely re-writes.  Then my patch patches
> >his patch :)
> >
> >Hopefully we'll be seeing all these at91 patches worked back into cvs
> >soon.
> >
>
>
>
>



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss