[ECOS] Samsung S3C45xx Platform Porting
Thu Nov 21 07:45:00 GMT 2002
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:38:22AM -0800, Jay Foster wrote:
> I can either repeat the sin and create my new "platform" as a
> variant-platform merged thing as
> "packages/hal/arm/<my_variant-platform>, or seperate the
> SNDS100 code into proper variant and platform, and add my new
> platform there.
First, I aplogize for my sin.
> Such as:
> packages/hal/arm/s3c45xx/snds100 SNDS100 platform
> packages/hal/arm/s3c45xx/var Common code
> packages/hal/arm/s3c45xx/<my-platform> My platform
> This seems to model what is done in the sa11x0 variant directory.
That would be the best thing to do.
> Has anyone else out there already done this for the Samsung
> ARM? I'm sure that there are others using the Samsung ARM
> processors, as I have seen posts about the SNDS100 developent
> board. What have they done?
My two ARM products are separate "platforms", even though they
would be better described as variants. Not the best solution,
but I haven't had time to do anything about it.
> My project doesn't really allow me the time to perform the
> SNDS100 platform Samsung variant seperation, nor do I feel
> competent enough with eCos and the CDL to do so.
Now you know how I felt when I committed the sin in the first
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
More information about the Ecos-discuss