[ECOS] mistake: off_t should be signed

Jonathan Larmour jlarmour@redhat.com
Tue Jan 15 13:53:00 GMT 2002

Donnat Eric wrote:
> Hi all,
> I found what looks like a mistake in the definition of off_t in
> <sys/types.h> : POSIX says (paragraph 2.5) that it should be a "signed
> arithmetic type", but I found that eCos defines it as unsigned.
> Feel free to correct it. ;-)

Done! Well spotted. Thanks,

Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine

More information about the Ecos-discuss mailing list