[ECOS] mistake: off_t should be signed

[Jonathan Larmour]

Donnat Eric wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I found what looks like a mistake in the definition of off_t in
> <sys/types.h> : POSIX says (paragraph 2.5) that it should be a "signed
> arithmetic type", but I found that eCos defines it as unsigned.
> 
> Feel free to correct it. ;-)

Done! Well spotted. Thanks,

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine