[ECOS] recvfrom patch
Thu Jan 3 18:19:00 GMT 2002
That's fine. I was just thinking that the other way MIGHT be slightly faster
because the compiler already has fromlen (which we know is zero) in a register.
Your way is easier to understand though.
Jonathan Larmour <email@example.com> on 01/03/2002 07:04:28 PM
To: Wade Jensen/Chandler/Inter-Tel@Inter-Tel
Subject: Re: [ECOS] recvfrom patch
Wade Jensen wrote:
> The recv function calls recvfrom with NULL parameters. recvfrom then
> dereferences a NULL pointer. This patch is a simple fix for this. I have
> tested it a LOT, and it does not seem to have any bad effects.
Thanks for the patch!
+ msg.msg_namelen = fromlen ? *fromlen : (socklen_t)fromlen;
why use (socklen_t)fromlen, i.e. the address of some variable? I've checked
msg.msg_namelen = fromlen ? *fromlen : 0;
instead if that's alright.
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
Inter-Tel -- Your Connection to the Future
More information about the Ecos-discuss