[ECOS] new operator in fopen.cxx

[David Oberbeck]

Marty,

   Hmmm -  you shouldn't have to explicitly define this... we don't and are using
the new operator with gcc-3.0.3 for an ARM target.

   Are you calling g++ or gcc when you compile? We invoke 'arm-elf-gcc' when
compiling C stuff, and 'arm-elf-g++' when compiling cpp things... and use
'arm-elf-gcc' when doing the final link.

Regards,
	David

On Wednesday 06 February 2002 09:37, Broeske Marty-FMB223 Wrote Thusly:
> Hey,
>
> I have had errors when linking with fopen() that the new operator is not
> defined. Seaching through the source I found that in all other instances
> where new is used the operator is defined within the module (see
> mutex.cxx). I solved my problem by including the following definition in
> fopen.cxx.
>
> inline void *operator new(size_t size) { return calloc(1,size); };
>
> I really don't feel good about this. I'm not a C++ expert but shouldn't
> there be a global definition for new somewhere?
>
> So it goes...
> Marty Broeske
> mbroeske@oddparity.com

-- 

"Entropy Requires No Maintenance"