[ECOS] Re: Ctrl-C interrupt problem.

[Mark Salter]

>>>>> Fabrice Gautier writes:

> It's much better but it's still 5 times slower than before...

> One strange thing is that i cna't exceed 511 bytes/write where before i
> could go up to about 1500. 

> I can't see why download speed would suffer from your patch, the only reason
> I see is some change in GDB beteween 5.0 and cvs. Do you know if there was
> some change ? Some limitation for the 511 bytes/write?

I'm not aware of such a gdb change, but I haven't been watching gdb development
that closely. I cannot believe that my patch alone would slow you down as the
flush is only done when stepping, continuing, or killing.

--Mark