problem with gcc3.2 compiler

[Gary Thomas]

On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 06:07, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > That's really too bad - we can't take it out globally because that
> > could possibly break things for folks using older compilers and we
> > may have troubles using newer ones..  
> > 
> > The proverbial rock and hard place :-(
> 
> Would a cdl option for the compiler version used be too ugly? 

We don't have very good handling of options like this.  Also, sadly,
the compiler options are somewhat spread around rather than being
localized (e.g. in the architecture HAL only).  Currently there
are 96! occurrences of -finit-priority, so making any change in this
area will be non-trivial.

We recently made some changes in the makefile rule template.  Perhaps
we could just make a similar one for this case.

-- 
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates