[PATCH] Add --devel-skip-producer

Mark Wielaard mark@klomp.org
Wed Mar 17 11:14:29 GMT 2021


Hi Tom,

On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 11:46 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 3/16/21 10:27 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > It is useful as --devel option, but I would be against it as non-
> > devel
> > option.
> 
> Could you explain in more detail why you would be against this as a
> non-devel option?  F.i., I'm curious, is it an abstract objection, or
> do
> you foresee concrete problems with the approach?

Of course I would never call my own objections abstract :)
But it partly is. I think it is questionable if we have to rely on the
producer string to do the right thing. But specifically just dropping a
whole CU DIE tree seems the wrong thing to do (what about the ranges,
loclists, stmt_lists left behind for example).

Cheers,

Mark


More information about the Dwz mailing list