[Bug debugedit/28598] 5.0 test failures on hppa-linux-gnu
dave.anglin at bell dot net
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Wed Nov 17 20:07:40 GMT 2021
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28598
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
The attached change fixes the test fails.
Dave
On 2021-11-17 1:28 p.m., mark at klomp dot org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28598
>
> Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |mark at klomp dot org
>
> --- Comment #1 from Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org> ---
> The issue here is that debugedit doesn't know about hppa ELF relocations (as
> used in debug sections). See tools/debugedit.c (setup_relbuf):
>
> rtype = ELF64_R_TYPE (rela.r_info);
> switch (dso->ehdr.e_machine)
> {
> case EM_SPARC:
> case EM_SPARC32PLUS:
> case EM_SPARCV9:
> if (rtype != R_SPARC_32 && rtype != R_SPARC_UA32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> case EM_386:
> if (rtype != R_386_32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> case EM_PPC:
> case EM_PPC64:
> if (rtype != R_PPC_ADDR32 && rtype != R_PPC_UADDR32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> case EM_S390:
> if (rtype != R_390_32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> case EM_IA_64:
> if (rtype != R_IA64_SECREL32LSB)
> goto fail;
> break;
> case EM_X86_64:
> if (rtype != R_X86_64_32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> case EM_ALPHA:
> if (rtype != R_ALPHA_REFLONG)
> goto fail;
> break;
> #if defined(EM_AARCH64) && defined(R_AARCH64_ABS32)
> case EM_AARCH64:
> if (rtype != R_AARCH64_ABS32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> #endif
> case EM_68K:
> if (rtype != R_68K_32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> #if defined(EM_RISCV) && defined(R_RISCV_32)
> case EM_RISCV:
> if (rtype != R_RISCV_32)
> goto fail;
> break;
> #endif
> #if defined(EM_MCST_ELBRUS) && defined(R_E2K_32_ABS)
> case EM_MCST_ELBRUS:
> if (rtype != R_E2K_32_ABS)
> goto fail;
> break;
> #endif
> default:
> fail:
> error (1, 0, "%s: Unhandled relocation %d at [%d] for %s section",
> dso->filename, rtype, ndx, sec->name);
> }
>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Debugedit
mailing list