fork error when trying to call VirtualAlloc with size==0

[Jeremy Drake]

On Fri, 23 May 2025, Yuyi Wang wrote:

> On Fri, 23 May 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > Maybe.  MSYS2 doesn't generally advise to rebase on x86_64, but I think
> > Cygwin does as part of its setup/postinstall hooks.  As a hack, I was able
> > to work around this by setting the "dynamicbase" flag on the dlls (it's a
> > long story about why this helps rather than hurts in this particular case)
>
> I believe it is ASLR right? I thought cygwin doesn't support such DLLs on fork.

Right

> If it helps here, should I add this flag for all DLLs & EXEs compiled by Rust?

No.