Package request libinih & libinih-devel

[Milos Komarcevic]

On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 11:09, Lemures Lemniscati wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've tried to build exiv2 from the upstream repository [1]
> with Adam's libinih package.

Thanks Lem for testing, I think this gives Adam the green light.

Adam, indeed this is a very small library and I presume will not increase its overhead in the future. I guess it's up to you whether to split it into the runtime and -devel packages as usual... Thank you very much for volunteering to maintain this package!

> Weirdly, this version [1] yields ./bin/cygexiv2-0.dll,
> while the current version v0.27.5 [2] yields ./bin/cygexiv2-27.dll.
> 
> I guess this change is not intended, but I don't know how to fix it.

Yeah, it's a known issue on the main branch coming from this line of code:

https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/blob/842ef05ee60bff765c0402a211971aed53b728cc/src/CMakeLists.txt#L168

and the fact that the main branch has an arbitrary version set to 1.0.0 for now...

It shouldn't be related to anything discussed here though.

Best regards,
Milos