[ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: coreutils 9.0 (TEST)
Brian Inglis
Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca
Wed Jul 20 04:22:00 GMT 2022
On 2022-07-19 21:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2022-07-19 15:06, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 7/19/2022 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> On 2022-07-19 12:00, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>> On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>>>> Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be
>>>>> installed by anyone.
>>>>
>>>> Then shouldn't you remove it? And you could also upload an
>>>> override.hint file with a "replace-versions" line for the sake of
>>>> people who have already installed it.
>>>
>>> I tried various measures and thought override.hint with
>>> replace-versions: 9.1-1 was there.
>>
>> It is there, so whatever you did worked. But that doesn't prevent
>> people from installing 9.1-1. If someone installs 9.1-1, then the
>> *next* time they run setup they'll get the suggestion to downgrade it.
>
> I previously asked about reverting the release, and did as suggested.
>
>> If you really don't want anyone to install 9.1-1, you should remove it.
>
> How do I get calm and setup to do that in the release area?
I have manually uploaded empty:
x86{,64}/release/coreutils{,/coreutils-debuginfo}/-coreutils-9.1-1.{,-src}.{hint,tar.xz}
and created !ready files in:
x86{,64}/release/coreutils{,/coreutils-debuginfo}/
which appears to have moved the files to the vault(/Attic) and dropped
the entries from setup.ini
That seems like a job for a cygport command like remove/vault! ;^>
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list