Kaz Kylheku (Cygwin)
Tue Feb 23 00:59:19 GMT 2021
On 2021-02-22 15:53, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2021-02-22 16:41, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
>> On 2021-02-22 11:19, cygwinautoreply wrote:
>> It would be ideal if this auto-reply didn't include the Cygwin
>> mailing list; there is no need for the mailing list to read this.
>> Scratch that; it would be ideal if neither the original question
>> nor the auto-reply were re-mailed.
> What if Cygwin is up to date and you see that message?
In that case, the message from newer Cygwin will not be accompanied
by a recommendation to post to the mailing list. Instead it points
to some online resources about the problem.
Those resources could loudly warn the user that mailing list messages
containing references to the FAST_CWD will receive a robot reply
and not get posted (for he reason that old releases of Cygwin
encouraged users to post reports of it, which keeps happening).
More information about the Cygwin