Mon Feb 22 23:53:04 GMT 2021
On 2021-02-22 16:41, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On 2021-02-22 11:19, cygwinautoreply wrote:
> It would be ideal if this auto-reply didn't include the Cygwin
> mailing list; there is no need for the mailing list to read this.
> Scratch that; it would be ideal if neither the original question
> nor the auto-reply were re-mailed.
What if Cygwin is up to date and you see that message?
It is a compatibility issue due to a speedup hack that could recur in newer
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]
More information about the Cygwin