headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ?
ASSI
Stromeko@nexgo.de
Sun Jan 26 08:05:00 GMT 2020
Marco Atzeri writes:
> at least I know that is not just my machine.
> When I released the package was
>
>
> libinterp/corefcn/file-io.cc-tst
> ............................... PASS 90/90
Based on the test name there may be an assumption built into the code
about how the filesystem behaves that isn't guaranteed on Windows/Cygwin
or even POSIX. If it's simply an error condition not getting checked it
should be reproducible under debugging, but you're mostly out of luck if
it's relying on a specific order or atomicity of certain operations, as
debugging will almost always serialize the execution to the point where
these types of errors do not manifest.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list