Bug in TIME function

[Kaz Kylheku]

On 2019-09-12 11:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> So even in light of the goal of Cygwin providing GNU/Linux 
> compatibility
> beyond POSIX, there is no justification for supporting times(0).

What I wrote here is not true; on Linux, this is a system call, which
provides detection of some kinds of bad pointers, turning them into 
-1/EFAULT.




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple