Cygwin fails to utilize Unicode replacement character

[David Macek]

On 4. 9. 2018 16:18, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> My vote is against the patch because the nodef glyph will often be just blank space which is certainly worse than ▒.

How often is "often"?  Do the default Windows fonts have okay nodef glyphs?

By the way, how does this work with OEM fonts?

-- 
David Macek

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4002 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20180904/7135eb3d/attachment.p7s>