Proposed patch for web site: update most links to HTTPS
Mon Apr 25 05:50:00 GMT 2016
Can you please elaborate on why? I'm confused on why you prefer that Cygwin links users to non-secure versions of pages? (which in many cases will be redirected anyways).
Links which ONLY work on http *have not* been changed and there are no other changes in this patch.
From: Andrey Repin [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 5:00 PM
To: Brian Clifton <firstname.lastname@example.org>; email@example.com
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for web site: update most links to HTTPS
Greetings, Brian Clifton!
> Hi folks,
> I have a proposed change for the web site. This patch (see below) will
> update most of the urls to HTTPS. In many cases there was a redirect;
> for those I captured the new canonical address.
With best regards,
Monday, April 25, 2016 02:59:46
Sorry for my terrible english...
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin