[ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.3
Mon Feb 23 12:08:00 GMT 2015
On Feb 21 12:25, cyg Simple wrote:
> > From: Corinna Vinschen
> > Maybe it is actually simpler than that. Invalidating the cache as a whole
> > probably never makes sense. In fact there are two reasons for
> > invalidation:
> > - The pw_name, pw_shell, pw_home, pw_gecos settings for a user changed.
> How is pw_name going to change without a logoff?
You're looking at the current user only. I'm talking about creating
arbitrary passwd entries.
> > - The interface to the DC was broken and there are entries of the type
> > Achim mentioned, "DOM+User(RID)".
> > The first case can only be fixed by invalidating the cache on a regular basis. If
> > we didn't fetch the info for a user for, say, 5 minutes, drop the entry from the
> > cache and renew the information by asking the DC again.
> Maybe too many requests to the DC for all users? Couldn't you just
> reinitialize if the network data changes? There are times when I
> would be on the DC and times when I am not with the same account.
Doesn't matter, we're not invalidating the cache yet anyway. It was
just idle musing.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Cygwin