[ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-3
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Tue Apr 14 15:12:00 GMT 2015
On Apr 14 17:01, Houder wrote:
> %% uname -a
> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW Seven 2.0.0(0.287/5/3) 2015-04-14 10:45 i686 Cygwin
> %% pwd
> /home/Test
> %% touch alfa
> %% chmod 460 alfa
> %% echo aha > alfa
> bash: alfa: Permission denied # no problem here ...
>
> %% getfacl alfa
> # file: alfa
> # owner: Test
> # group: None
> user::r--
> group::r-x
> mask:rw-
> other:---
> %% icacls alfa
> alfa NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,WEA,X,DC)
> Seven\Test:(DENY)(S,WD,AD,WEA,DC)
> Seven\Test:(R,D,WDAC,WO,WA)
> Seven\None:(DENY)(S,X)
> Seven\None:(RX)
> Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
> Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files
> %%
This looks exactly like the ACL created by -0.3. It produces this MASK
value. The rest is just the logical consequence. But it doesn't do
that for me:
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.3 vmbert8164 2.0.0(0.287/5/3) 2015-04-14 10:47 x86_64 Cygwin
$ touch alfa
$ getfacl alfa
# file: alfa
# owner: corinna
# group: vinschen
user::rw-
group::r--
other:r--
$ chmod 460 alfa
$ getfacl alfa
# file: alfa
# owner: corinna
# group: vinschen
user::r--
group::rw-
other:---
$ icacls alfa | cat
alfa NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S)
VINSCHEN\corinna:(DENY)(S,WD,AD,WEA,DC)
VINSCHEN\corinna:(R,D,WDAC,WO,WA)
VINSCHEN\vinschen:(R,W)
Everyone:(Rc,S,RA)
The only reason I can think of is that the parent dir has default
permissions which imply the mask value already. So, what does
`icacls . | cat' in this directory print?
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20150414/83dc710c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list