Wed May 14 03:01:00 GMT 2014
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:26:01PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I've taken the ball back. We don't need a new maintainer.
>You clearly do, as I have shown. You are just choosing not to take one
>on. That is your right of course. Let us continue the status quo.
>>I've spoken with Eric. I'm relieved that he still wants to stay on.
>>If his, or any other maintainer's update speed is not meeting
>>expectations then please, as suggested, just build the packages for your
You aren't privy to my private conversation with Eric. I'm clearly
satisfied that he will get around to updating his packages and I am
confident in his ability to follow through on this.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin