timeout in LDAP access
Mon Jul 28 18:51:00 GMT 2014
On 2014-07-28 11:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 18 21:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> We really should do that to avoid collisions with system accounts, IMHO.
>> But maybe we should handle it as a border case of a border case, and
>> reliably. Rather than using the default fake mechanism, what if
>> we use default offsets for the two cases:
>> Case 1: posix offset is < 0x100000 ==> Enforce posix 0ffset 0xfe80000
>> Case 2: posix offset can't be fetched (this points to a local user
>> having no access to this kind of domain information)
>> ==> Enforce posix offset 0xfe000000.
>> This would result in potential collisions in very rare border cases,
>> but it would result in reliable mappings throught all processes.
>> And, the complexity would be quite small.
> any feedback on this one? Shall I create a snapshot with a matching
I have nothing to add except that i am a great fan of cygwin snapshots in
general, and i suppose that if several posix offsets are set to 0, it is
a minor problem if all of them get replaced by the same 0xfe80000.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin