cygcheck and literal plus sign

[Larry Hall (Cygwin)]

On 1/22/2014 11:05 AM, David Boyce wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> So I'll change my answer to "I don't know".
>
> How about 'g[+][+]' or 'g[+]{2}'?

May I suggest that curious folks can more directly validate workarounds
by trying them directly.  cygwin.com generally has reasonable turnaround.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple