gcc-4.8.2-1: /bin/gcc fails
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Tue Nov 5 09:52:00 GMT 2013
On Nov 4 20:18, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote:
> >My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir
> >aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd
> >and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate. 'Course, my
> >to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users
> >with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup
> >doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism).
> >
> >The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and
> >sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin.
> >
> >If --libexecdir=/usr/lib, then...what?
> >
> >Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers? Use $libexecdir but
> >"know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately? I'm
> >confused as to how to proceed here.
>
> Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with
> --libexecdir=/usr/sbin makes the most sense.
Full ACK. Otherwise you'd have to provide some script which tweaks an
existing /etc/inetd.conf to use the new paths. Possible, but hardly
worth the effort.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20131105/fe11d744/attachment.sig>
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list