cygport limitations

Warren Young
Fri Jun 21 07:26:00 GMT 2013

On 6/20/2013 12:44, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> There should NEVER be a reason that you can't use cygport for your
> packages.  If you're having an issue, just provide your (draft)
> cygport(5) and ask.

Thanks for the offer.  I've left myself a note to try this again for the 
next ctags release.

I have no idea if there ever will be a new Exuberant Ctags.  The last 
release came out 4 years ago, and activity to the ctags-devel list has 
been under 1 post per month[*] for the past 6 months.

I'd be willing to convert 5.8 to cygport if this plan of Corinna's for 
an automated build server goes through.


Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list