Fri Jun 21 07:26:00 GMT 2013
On 6/20/2013 12:44, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> There should NEVER be a reason that you can't use cygport for your
> packages. If you're having an issue, just provide your (draft)
> cygport(5) and ask.
Thanks for the offer. I've left myself a note to try this again for the
next ctags release.
I have no idea if there ever will be a new Exuberant Ctags. The last
release came out 4 years ago, and activity to the ctags-devel list has
been under 1 post per month[*] for the past 6 months.
I'd be willing to convert 5.8 to cygport if this plan of Corinna's for
an automated build server goes through.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin