wrong performance of malloc/free under multi-threading
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Tue Feb 26 09:14:00 GMT 2013
On Feb 26 15:35, MITSUNARI Shigeo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I found that the performance of malloc/free is wrong under multi-threading.
> The following test program reproduces the problem.
>
> The program repeats malloc and free under multi-thread.
> I measured the timing on Cygwin and Linux.
>
> timing(sec)| threadNum
> -----------+----------+-------------
> | 1 | 2
> -----------+----------+-------------
> Linux | 1.45 | 0.69
> -----------+----------+-------------
> Cygwin | 2.059 | 53.165
> -----------+----------+-------------
>
> The timing under Linux seems good scale but it is very wrong under Cygwin.
> Is it intentional behavior or do I use pthread in bad way?
No, you're right. This is easily reproducable. I just had a look and
it seems that our malloc is really slow in multi-threading scenarios.
We're using Doug Lea's malloc unchanged with just additional locks
surrounding the underlying malloc/free calls.
This appears to be a serious performance problem. I just learned that
glibc uses another version of dlmalloc, called ptmalloc, which is a
derived version of dlmalloc optimized for multi-threading environments.
Perhaps we have to do the same, but I don't know how long it takes to
port ptmalloc to Cygwin and obviously I don't know how big the
performance gain might be.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list