Using recvmsg() with non-unicast datagram (UDP) socket: inconsistent results
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Wed Aug 1 09:05:00 GMT 2012
On Jul 31 12:43, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Observed is an inconsistent result when recvmsg() is used on a
> UDP socket with or without ancillary control message parameters.
>
> Here's is an example:
>
> static char buf[1 << 16];
> struct sockaddr_in sin;
> struct msghdr msg;
> struct iovec iov;
> #ifndef CYGWIN_BUG
> char cmsgbuf[32];
> #endif /*CYGWIN_BUG*/
> int n;
>
> iov.iov_base = buf;
> iov.iov_len = sizeof(buf);
> memset(&sin, 0, sizeof(sin));
> memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
> msg.msg_name = (caddr_t) &sin;
> msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(sin);
> msg.msg_iov = &iov;
> msg.msg_iovlen = 1;
> #ifndef CYGWIN_BUG
> memset(cmsgbuf, 0, sizeof(cmsgbuf));
> msg.msg_control = cmsgbuf;
> msg.msg_controllen = sizeof(cmsgbuf);
> #endif /*CYGWIN_BUG*/
>
> if ((n = recvmsg(sock, &msg, 0/*no special flags*/)) <= 0) {
> /* Handle error */
> return;
> }
>
> /* HERE: msg.msg_flags is inconsistent here for non-unicast UDP sockets */
>
> For a non-unicast socket "sock", the returned msg.msg_flags will have proper WSA
> bits (MSG_BCAST or MSG_MCAST) set if CYGWIN_BUG is not defined (i.e. the recvmag()
> call is passed non-zero msg.msg_controllen). Otherwise, msg.msg_flags will always
> get returned 0.
>
> The relevant code from CYGWIN source suggests that the native WSA flags should
> have got preserved (fhandler_socket.cc, fhandler_socket::recvmsg):
>
> msg->msg_flags = wsamsg.dwFlags;
>
> yet apparently this had slipped away in fhandler_socket::recv_internal, which
> branches on the presence of msg_controllen (and opts out for use other WSA API
> call if that is not set, even for non-stream sockets):
>
> if (wsamsg->Control.len > 0)
> {
> ...
> use_recvmsg = true;
> }
>
> Can this please be rectified?
I applied a patch which should fix this problem. It always uses
WSARecvMsg now, if called from recvmsg, still provided it is possible,
of course (No SOCK_STREAM, no AF_LOCAL).
I'm just generating a new developer snapshot. Please give the today's
snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ a try. Should be up in about
half an hour.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list