plotting from octave: address space already occupied, fork aborts
Thu Sep 15 02:29:00 GMT 2011
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:02:36PM +0200, Marco atzeri wrote:
>On 9/14/2011 5:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Why do we need to add an arbitrary new extension here? Why isn't
>>octave using "dll"? "oct" is certainly not a standard extension for a
>octave is using .oct on all platforms including linux
>upstream choice, no specific difference for cygwin
Maybe they should be called ".dll" on Cygwin then.
Either that or we need to come up with some way for packages to register
their idiosyncratic shared library extensions with rebaseall.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin