(CVS) SH_USER_SHAREDplus allocation
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Mon Oct 24 09:21:00 GMT 2011
On Oct 22 14:35, jan.kolar wrote:
>
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2011-q2/msg00196.html
> introduced reordering of SH_- related memory blocks and the following change
>
> | - unsigned size = offsets[i + 1] - offsets[i];
> | + unsigned size = offsets[i] - offsets[i + 1];
> | offsets[i] += delta;
> | if (!VirtualAlloc (off_addr (i), size, MEM_RESERVE, PAGE_NOACCESS))
>
> However, address range is to be allocated using its LOWER boundary
> which is now offsets[i + 1].
Fixed in CVS.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list