We have a "cygstart" -- why not a "cygstop"?
Mon Jun 13 08:49:00 GMT 2011
Or does such an idea go too much against the grain of "let's keep Cygwin
as much of a Unix as possible?"
At the very least, it would cut through all the rigamorole of "kill"-ing
pids that were likely to return errors.
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin