rebaseall rebasing dlls into cygwin address range?

[Edward Lam]

On Wed, April 20, 2011 21:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> But, for now, just setting the base to something higher:
>
> rebaseall -b 0x77000000
>
> would solve some of the problems we've seen.
>
> I don't know if that stomps on system routines or not, though.

Just curious, why is this even a problem? If the system libraries happen
to use some base address that is already taken up, the loader is supposed
to just choose a different spot.

-Edward


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple