Cygwin slow on x64 systems

Edward Lam
Tue Aug 31 15:12:00 GMT 2010

On 8/31/2010 10:08 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Here's what I'm saying:  It makes absolutely no sense that moving the
> call would have any effect.  The code is the way it is for a reason
> so we're not going to just revert the change.

I don't think anyone is asking to revert the change.

In any case, is it absolutely necessary for us to call 
wait_for_sigthread() before we do the other initialization in 
dll_crt0_1() ? ie. can we move it further down? Or perhaps we can 
reorder the initialization code somewhat such that we can do more work 
before calling wait_for_sigthread()?


Problem reports:
Unsubscribe info:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list