ImageMagick: More insufficient package dependencies
Wed Aug 18 20:50:00 GMT 2010
On Aug 18 21:32, William Blunn wrote:
> On 18/08/2010 19:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 06:40:17PM +0100, William Blunn wrote:
> >>My apologies to all the folks NOT involved in maintaining the ImageMagick package, but there doesn't appear to be any defined process for reporting bugs which might narrow down the attention-grab to a more relevant set of people.
> >Actually, this is the defined way to report bugs in a cygwin package.
> Ahhhh I see. It's /defined/ to be mediocre.
> Rather than attempting to solve the problem head-on, redefine the
> problem domain so that the problem is already solved.
Is there something in the water lately, which makes people on the
list more aggressive than usual?
It hasn't been redefined at all. It's the common way of reporting
problems for a long time: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
If you don't like it, I'm sorry. Are you going to volunteer to
maintain a Cygwin packages bug-tracking system?
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin