[1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty
Mon May 4 05:04:00 GMT 2009
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:51:58AM +0100, Fergus wrote:
> >>Just noticed that after the recent unison upgrade there exists a file
> >> /usr/bin/unison
> >>Also just noticed (but this must have occurred a while ago - 30/03/09
> >>maybe, the date of a TeX upgrade?) that there now exists a directory
> >> /usr/lib/texmf/
> >>with deep non-empty subdirectory structure. Is it the case for [1.7]
> >>that both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ should be empty as for [1.5]?
> >>Possibly the texmf/ packaging issue has been corrected in subsequent
> >>upgrades and so /usr/lib/texmf/ can be deleted without compromising
> >>functionality; but I think the appearance of /usr/bin/unison is very
> >How about humoring our need for details by providing cygcheck output
> >as mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html ?
> Sorry. Attached.
For the future: there's no need to bzip the attachment. That makes it harder
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin