UAC .manifest files
Corinna Vinschen
corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com
Wed Jun 3 08:11:00 GMT 2009
On Jun 2 23:21, Yaakov S wrote:
> I think the best solution is to let cygport detect susceptible apps
> and generate .manifest files automatically.
>
> 1. AFAICS, this affects EXEs with names containing "install", "patch",
> "setup", or "update". Are there any more patterns?
I never saw more than exactly this list.
> 2. According to MSDN[1], the name attribute of the assemblyIdentity
> subelement should be uniquely named in a Organization.Division.Name
> format. Our existing manifests don't do that; should we? Does it
> matter?
I don't know if it matters, but it certainly doesn't hurt either. As a
suggestion, when automating this, the name could be constructed like
this:
Organization=Cygwin
Division=<packagename>
Name=<executable>
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list