To boost maintainer

[Andrew Schulman]

> No, you  have not done adequate testing obviously.
> 
> I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with
> cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work.
> 
> Stop giving wrong information to people, you are wasting others' time.
> I see that you've said exactly the same thing to somebody else who
> couldn't get it to work.

Dude.  Sorry things aren't working out as you'd like, but a nasty tone like
that just closed off any possibility of anyone here helping you.  I think
your only two options now are to apologize or leave.

> PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list

Right!  What else?


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple