ps executable does not appear to match source

[paul.hermeneutic@gmail.com]

> On Jan 17, 2008 9:38 PM,  <> wrote:
> > The ps that comes with Cygwin is missing a number of features that
> > appear to be in the procps-3.2.7/ps/ source code.  The source code
> > does not look like it was used to build the executable.  Is this
> > correct?
>
> Cygwin has both ps and procps available.  The ps in Cygwin has the
> advantage of showing Windows processes, too.  The procps is just what
> you'd expect.
>
> -Jason

The ps from procps appears to be what is in use on Linux.  Why is the
ps for Cygwin not built from this?

>From which package is the ps in Cygwin built?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/