Slowness problem due to sjlj-exceptions for Octave

Thu Sep 6 02:18:00 GMT 2007

Sorry just error correction again
>James R. Phillips, who is a maintainer of octave 2.1.73. Pherhaps he 
>is not working as a maintainer because he has not been made any 
>respose when I threw a topic of  my testing binary of Octave 2.9.12 
>on cygwin.
>John W. Eaton, who is a main develper, seems not to like use 
>undefault complier because octave uses the develop category tools 
>including gcc for the advanced user tool. (Function can be complied 
>to specially named dynamic link library *.oct)
>He is afraid that the specially prepared complier confuses the user.
>For this reason, James selected the gcc normally prepared.
>At that time, there was no other way to build octave on windows so 
>that even slow binary is meaningful.       

Please note that the above is mere my speculation.

Tatsuro MATSUOKA  

Unsubscribe info:
Problem reports:

More information about the Cygwin mailing list