cygwin 1.5.24-2 gcc 3.4.4 stdio.h
Thu Nov 29 11:48:00 GMT 2007
On 29 November 2007 04:10, Paul Edwards wrote:
> until I ran across this C compiler that
> doesn't even manage to conform to a spec that has been available for
> around 20 years.
I get what you're asking for, and it's perfectly reasonable, but it's just
not the compiler's problem. The C compiler does conform; it's the newlib C
*run-time library* that is not C89-compatible. Gcc is doing it's part, but
gcc does not supply stdio.h; it's up to the library to wrap the headers in
> Which list do I need to go to to consult someone
> about modifying newlib? I can probably make the changes to get it at least
> closer to C89 compliance if I have someone to give patches to.
The newlib home page is http://sourceware.org/newlib. There's a newlib@
mailing list hosted at sourceware, and that's where to send patches; the home
page has all the usual details of cvs access etc. and how to contribute. I'm
sure your help would be welcomed!
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin