Announce: FlexDLL, flexible DLLs under Windows
Tue Nov 20 19:05:00 GMT 2007
On 20 November 2007 18:39, Reini Urban wrote:
> 2007/11/20, Christopher Faylor:
>> Indeed, this is very interesting. It sounds a little like the
>> autoload.cc code in Cygwin which handles optional linking from dlls but it
>> is obviously much more advanced.
> Where should it go to?
> Puttin it into libtool sounds nearest to me, to work around -no-undefined.
(Without having actually specced out the implementation yet,) I don't see
why we couldn't do this trick entirely in ld, with a support routine or two in
libgcc. It can't go entirely into libtool, I would have thought; it requires
some additional code at runtime.
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin