High CPU usage on posix_fallocate call - CVS version
Mon Nov 5 11:23:00 GMT 2007
On Nov 2 17:42, Rob Bosch wrote:
> I found on MSDN that Windows has the capfilealloc function in all Windows OS
> versions. This function was designed to create a preallocated capture file
> of a specified size. It seems like this would accomplish what cygwin needs
> with the posix_fallocate function?
Not at all. Did you *read* what this method is about?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Bosch [mailto:XXXXXXXX@XXX.XXX]
Even though this is your own mail address, please:
> When my compiled version of rsync is using the posix_fallocate function IÂm
> getting significant CPU usage. [...]
> getting 20%-25% CPU utilization during the posix_fallocate call. [...]
> It also takes 20 minutes for the file to be created using this call.
I can't reproduce this behaviour. I created a 40 Gigs file (haven't 77
Gigs left) on my XP box using the posix_fallocate function (which, btw.,
is basically just a single native NT call under the hood) and it takes
roughly a few milliseconds.
Did you look for http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#BLODA ?
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin