Setup.exe requirements [was RE: Cygintl-3.dll was not found]

[infoterror]

Christopher Faylor-2 wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure if you got my point or not but if you don't develop an
> installer which deals with categories and dependencies, then I don't see
> how it could be considered a replacement for setup.exe.  If you do this,
> then you don't need to list all of the packages in "Base".  You just
> need to know that there is a "Base" and deal with that.
> 

You've been carrying this axe to grind for a long time. Why not accept that
you're dealing with a different paradigm and get off your pretentious high
horse?

FYI
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Cygintl-3.dll-was-not-found-tf869884.html#a7124766
Sent from the Cygwin Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/