Obscene content in cygwin file.

[Andrew DeFaria]

Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Reed
>> Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 12:51 PM
>> To: Gary R. Van Sickle
>> Subject: RE: Obscene content in cygwin file.
>>
>> On 2005-01-08T17:57-0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> ) - The limericks in question are of interest only to 
>> junior-highschool-age
>> ) sysadmins and lawyers.
>>
>> I find them humorous.
>
> So are you a lawyer, or a junior-high-school-age sysadmin?

Isn't that your still unproven assertion? Stop engaging in strawmen.

>> ) - Redacting the limericks in question from Cygwin will eliminate 
>> the risk
>> ) they cause.
>>
>> You are not a lawyer,
>
> Says who?

Well you could easily clear that up. Are you a lawyer? Obviously not 
since by your very own assertion you are not interested in these 
limericks! (See what happens when you use silly arguments - you trip 
yourself up in them).

>> Please do not try to express a false legal opinion to justify a 
>> faulty personal one.
>
> I am expressing no legal opinion. I am merely stating the obvious: if 
> there's no potty-mouth there to offend, nobody can be offended by the 
> potty-mouth. Do you disagree with this axiom?

We have not established that either. Again it is your assertion.
-- 
Why do people ask "Can I ask you a question?".... Didn't really give me 
a choice there, did ya sunshine?


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/