Obscene content in cygwin file.

[Jon A. Lambert]

Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Perhaps.  Could somebody tell me the single-best reason for providing
> the profanity at all?
>
> Hello?
>
> Anybody?

Apparently some distros have split off the package into parts like
fortune   - the program with no data
fortune-min  - the quotes
fortune-off   - the stuff that'd make a sailor blush

fortune-mod-boh
fortune-mod-homer
fortune-mod-bible-1.0

I'd of course prefer the following packaging:
fortune
fortune-min
fortune-mod-bible-1.0

But  not just because it would be amusing to see the half of the unoffended
suddenly start squealing about pulling it or encrypting it.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/