/proc functionality; ls errors

Christopher Faylor cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com
Wed Feb 2 17:43:00 GMT 2005

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb  1 22:00, linda w wrote:
>> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just
>> happen to disappear due to some other improvement?  Either way...
>It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils.
>> 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release,
>> these days.
>Usually within the same year.
>>   I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem
>> to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having
>> a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)).
>Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately?  Otherwise,
>as Brian wrote, try a snapshot.

I thought that section was designed for punishment, not information.

Corinna, you seem to forget that we make building cygwin very hard so that
we are assured of job security.


Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

More information about the Cygwin mailing list