/proc functionality; ls errors
Wed Feb 2 09:28:00 GMT 2005
On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote:
> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just
> happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way...
It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils.
> 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release,
> these days.
Usually within the same year.
> I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem
> to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having
> a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)).
Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately? Otherwise,
as Brian wrote, try a snapshot.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Red Hat, Inc.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
More information about the Cygwin