1.5.10: expr + configure failure + testcase (also on 1.5.11-1)

Christopher Faylor cgf-no-personal-reply-please@cygwin.com
Tue Sep 14 13:00:00 GMT 2004


On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:11:39AM +0200, Peter Ekberg wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I was thinking the same thing but AFAIK, ash doesn't have the pid
>>recycling problem.
>
>Don't know where ash comes into play, the script is executed by bash.
>I must have missed some other test case...

Remember this?

>On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:05:01AM -0400, Bogdan Vacaliuc wrote:
>>4) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00449.html
>>   thru http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00556.html
>>
>>This relates to Manfred Spraul's patch for bash related to RECYCLES_PIDS.  I
>>have observed the failure to occur under (a)sh, and bash 2.04.5, 2.05b and
                                            ****
>>3.00.0 ( I compiled them all, including enabling the RECYCLES_PIDS for bash
>>2.05b ).

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



More information about the Cygwin mailing list