Extending long threads
GARY VANSICKLE
g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net
Mon Jul 12 01:14:00 GMT 2004
> GARY VANSICKLE wrote:
>> There's three reasons people knee-jerk against HTML email:
>>
>> 1. It isn't ASCII (i.e. the "Back in my day a child would open up a
>> gift and within seconds he'd either burst into flames or lose a limb!
>> That's the way it was and we liked it!"[1] Defense).
>> 2a. There isn't an email program alive which can do a "Reply" to an
>> HTML email properly.
> I'm using one right now...
>
> Mozilla (Thunderbird) handles replying to HTML email just fine.
>
Yep, it does the best job last I checked.
>> 2b. ...especially those which support VT-100 terminals.
>> 3. The lines are longer than 80 characters ;-).
>>
>> I fall under category 2a, but my knee isn't jerking: If Outlook
>> didn't absolutely s*ck *ss at "editing" HTML I wouldn't care.
> You can't blame everything on your choice to use Outlook.
I don't blame anything on my choice to use Outlook.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list