{FAQ, UG} alert? rebase

[Thomas L Roche]

At 09:38 PM 2/22/2004, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>> Given recent traffic concerning the goodness of rebase'ing, e.g.

>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01097.html
>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00899.html

>> (but occasional breakage, e.g.

>> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg01100.html

>> ) perhaps some treatment of the topic is FAQ- or UG-worthy?

Larry Hall 02/22/2004 10:49:11 PM:
> I think we can categorize the current problem as a bug.

The zsh problem, yes

> Given that this is likely a bug, it doesn't make much sense to
> document it formally in the FAQ or UG.

I wasn't proposing to document the zsh/rebase bug, but rather the

* general goodness of rebase

* specific use of rebase for problem solution (e.g. prior to
  full-scale debugging) and general "cygwin hygeine."


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/